B513 Planning Meeting, 19th December
2002
Present:
Tony Cass, Anne Funken, Jose
Miranda-Vizuete
1.
Previous Minutes
- Approved.
2.
Substation Planning
- The Design study bureau visited CERN on
11th December. They have been given Nigel’s draft plans,
photographs of the transformers and some geological information. Following
feedback from the firm, the plans for the various openings in the dalle
have been revised to avoid creating weak points. The firm will evaluate
the cost-effectiveness of using a thicker dalle (45cm vs 30cm ) instead of beams. We expect an “avant-projet’ by
mid-January.
- Tony said that he now considers it
rather unlikely that the substation will be even part commissioned in
February 2003. We should maintain momentum with the bunker but accept that
the full substation would be commissioned in Autumn
2004. He asked what impact such a delay would have on the power
distribution in B513 and on ordering schedules.
- The equipment
load will be limited to 800kVA by the UPS capacity (1200kVA total
capacity, but one module required for redundancy). We need to await the
results of the live diesel tests in January to understand if the full UPS
capacity can supported by the diesels.
- Anne said that we
can order the 18kV cells in February whenever we expect the substation to
be commissioned. Although we would have to pay for the equipment on
delivery it can be stocked until required and the guarantee only starts
at installation time. Further, Anne considered that we should order the protections
for the cells now as the purchase limit on the contract is close to being
reached. We should avoid a situation in which we have to launch a
tendering process for the substation equipment.
- Anne reported on discussions she had had
with Yannic Body about the electrical supply arrangements for air
conditioning equipment.
- To support a
2.5MW equipment load, a new 1.6MW chiller is required (to be installed in
2005) and the existing 1.2MW chillers would be progressively replaced by
1.4MW chillers as part of the regular maintenance. With present plans,
although the chillers would be split across PDUs the overall system would
still depend on a single connection for the control system.
- To support a 4MW
load three 2MW chillers would be installed requiring a 3.3kV supply. This
supply would clearly be independent from the 400V supply but it is
extremely unlikely that the chillers connected to the 400V supply would
be able to provide adequate cooling to cover a failure in the 3.3kV
supply.
- Given the need
for a 3.3kV supply for a 4MW solution, it is not possible to plan a
redundant supply for 2.5MW that could be upgraded to support a 4MW
solution. ST/CV are uncertain how to proceed.
- Tony felt that we have a choice between
planning for
- a poor 2.5MW
solution (no redundancy and keeping obsolete PDUs),
- a solid and
reliable 2.5MW solution that we know cannot be upgraded to 4MW, and
- a 4MW solution.
Put like this, we have to choose option “b”. However, we must clearly
identify the investment that would be wasted if we were ever to implement a 4MW
solution.
3.
Machine Room Distribution
- Anne will revisit planning for an
upgrade of the machine room electrical distribution in late January once
the substation design is complete. Anne felt that this is still adequate
to allow work to start in the second half of 2003. Most of the
implementation will be a straight copy of work in the vault, but with PDUs
rated at 400A, not 250A. The one issue that has still to be settled is
provision for harmonic filters.
4.
AOB
- Next meeting: 14:00 Friday 17th
January.